🔗 Share this article

An activist group has stated to have harvested millions of songs from the popular streaming service and is getting ready to publish them publicly.

Potential Boost for AI Training

Observers said the apparent leak could aid artificial intelligence firms looking for material to develop their technology.

A group known as Anna’s Archive said it had scraped 86 million audio tracks from the platform and 256 million entries of associated data such as artist and album names. The company, which hosts more than 100 million songs, confirmed that the leak did not represent its full inventory.

“We have located and deactivated the nefarious user accounts that were involved in unlawful scraping,” stated a company representative.

The Stockholm-based company, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, added that an inquiry into unauthorised access found a third party scraped public metadata and employed questionable methods to bypass DRM [digital rights management].

Group's Stated Goal and Worries

The streaming service does not believe the audio taken by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for providing links to pirated books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

The group claimed the audio files represented 99.6% of all music listened to by Spotify users and would be distributed via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a means of exchanging large data files online.

“Of course Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great beginning,” said Anna’s Archive, which describes its purpose as “preserving humanity’s information and culture”.

Model Development and Intellectual Property Debate

Ed Newton-Rex for protecting artists’ copyright, remarked the breached music would likely be used for training artificial intelligence systems.

“Training on illegally sourced material is unfortunately common in the tech sector, so this accessed music is highly likely to be used training AI models,” he stated.

The Anna’s Archive site makes references to LibGen, a huge online archive of pirated books that has reportedly been used by Meta to develop its AI models.

The co-founder of an artificial intelligence company wrote on the professional network that members of the public could in theory “create their own personal free equivalent of the service”. The executive said it could also allow tech companies to “train on contemporary music at a large volume”.

Intellectual property law has emerged as a battleground between artists, writers and creatives on one side and tech giants on the other.

Policy Considerations and Reactions

In the UK, artists and writers have protested against a government proposal to allow AI companies utilize protected work without permission unless the rights holder opts out. Virtually every participant to a government call for evidence on the idea has backed artists’ apprehensions.

A government minister for technology, innovation and technology told parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the issue, noting that ministers would “use the time to get this correct”. The administration has committed to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by next year.