🔗 Share this article Families' Heartache Over Coastal Erosion Endangering Coastal Norfolk Burial Sites Families of people buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family. A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations. A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed. “At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.” Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said. Troubled by the Past One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard. “You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.” “I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.” A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated. “It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.” In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.” Searching for Solutions and Certainty The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried. Some are calling for more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is approaching. “It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.” A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.” He added there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.” “There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.” The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.