🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to reinitiate nuclear negotiations with the United States on condition that it is approached with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has stated.

The Iranian diplomat said solely negotiations worked, and shared new appeals had come from mediators to resume discussions with the American leadership. He said Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran could not yet allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to access struck enrichment centers for security reasons.

Navigating a Complex Course

Araghchi is navigating a complex path since Iran does not want appear to be operating from a situation of vulnerability, and he consistently maintained that Iran had arisen stronger defensively and psychologically from the Israeli-US attack on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an inalienable right to enrich uranium within its borders that it will never give up" – the primary cause of the stalemate in the earlier negotiations.

Prior Discussions Unexpectedly Ended

The prior phases of discussions between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and hostile termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, struck Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with Donald Trump declaring the sites had been eliminated. Subsequently, European countries exercised their authority to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran asserts they have not had a major impact.

Magic Solution Suggested

Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had attained a "magic solution" to the enrichment issue in earlier negotiations, when it was settled an local partnership with American involvement could process nuclear material. The two nations would have been able to declare success since local refinement would have remained and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been agreed in the talks that US nuclear scientists could work within Iranian territory, but that was a logical implication of the consortium proposal. Diplomats asserted three times they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy the American negotiator only for the arrangement to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Position

Iranian officials declared the partnership proposal was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be reintroduced in certain ways if talks resume.

Trump last week said he had been getting signals that Iran sought to restart talks, but confidentially Tehran representatives say they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from Washington either directly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of inactivity in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran states negotiations is not part of a spectacle.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his speech to the forum, intended to portray the US as a dominant force that abuses the concept of worldwide standards, Araghchi stated the two-week conflict demonstrated the dispute could not be settled by military means. He said the strikes commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an unconditional Iranian surrender and ended with an complete request for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with total Washington understanding and cooperation, making trust hard to reestablish.

Negotiations Remains the Ultimate Resolution

Araghchi stated: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted dialogue; it was America and the western countries that had always sought to impose their demands during the talks. Dialogue can still be alive and continues the final resolution to settle conflicts, but its requirements, guidelines and fundamentals must be respected."

"Provided that they speak to the nation of Iran with the approach of dignity and honor, they will get a answer in the equivalent approach."

Recovery and Rebuilding

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the battle of repair and rebuilding, the foreign minister stated he was assured Iran's defence capabilities "have significantly improved than before 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been reestablished. We learned many lessons from this war; we have come to know our internal vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of the enemy."

He stated: "We managed to survive this engagement. Our nuclear technology, which they intended to eliminate, stays intact. The sites and gear, if destroyed, will be rebuilt; what is important is the will of the Iranian people and then the national cohesion that they aimed at, but were unable to break. The citizens of Tehran have developed more resilient, more cohesive, and more supportive of the administration and the country in the face of this assault."