🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the UK, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an celebration that was initiated as a celebration and reminder of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has developed a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate events where African descendants are remunerated to talk to white audiences about hidden biases and “allyship”. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests generated a rise in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has reached its height, producing a diluted aftermath of what increasing understanding is for.

The History of Black History Month

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in October in the Britain, Deutschland, Ireland and the Netherlands.

The month has evolved since those days, giving reduced attention to the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and greater focus on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with lectures and artistic activities. But the method the month is commemorated is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it progresses is a valuable example in how assimilation leads to weakening: the transformation of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to tackle embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Hardly anything shows how important it is to rethink Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the United Kingdom, a revitalized conservative movement in the form of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a legislator feels empowered to state that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are growing in the European continent as a entirety.

In the United States, a massive attack against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been taken, often successfully, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A drive to remove African American heritage and narrative from the archives is in progress. One of the former president's initial presidential directives focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a organized and extensive campaign to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as inherently racist”.

Given these circumstances, the observance represents how little it can be impactful if it is restricted to either obligatory business commemorations, or politically neutered festivities of historical achievements, rather than addressing the conditions of the current era. It also shows how its short period means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. A university professor, a professor at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the month. “The issue with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a urge to just do away with observances such as Black History Month completely, believing they are no longer suitable, or are vestiges of an era that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and heritage of activism for racial justice – community-based BLM initiatives, inclusion and equity efforts, and yes, even those talks to businesses – form an foundation that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month appear as? Firstly, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is distributed through the year (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not evade governmental matters, and allows opportunity for people, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves mere awareness of the history when it fails to address the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Institutions who mark it should not be comforted with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but faced with the risks that face all if fight against prejudice is not taken seriously. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and adaptive. It could be that an total re-identification is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.