🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's security policy document offers a flawed view of the European Union. It claims that open-border policies and what it terms "woke" agendas represent an existential risk to the continent's identity. However, this perspective is based on a fundamental misinterpretation of the reality. The true challenge confronting the EU is not societal but technological and economic backwardness.

A Glaring Growth Gap Between the US and Europe

Statistics reveal a sobering picture. From 2008 and 2023, US GDP grew by 87%, while a paltry 13.5% increase for the European Union. Over this period, EU GDP per capita fell from over three-quarters to just 50% of the American figure. Remarkably, even the poorest US state now boasts a greater average income than several leading European economies like Italy and France.

Currently, about half of the global top fifty technology firms are US-based, while only four are European.

The Technological Shortfall: The Core Question

This widening economic gap stems from superior efficiency gains in the United States, largely due to technological innovation and better use of resources. The scene of global tech leadership is decidedly American. Over the past five decades, 241 US firms have scaled into companies valued at over ten billion dollars, versus just 14 in the European continent.

This gap raises a pressing question: As the competition for future industries like AI, semiconductors, and fusion energy, what is Europe positioned? Most analysts agree it is essentially a contest between two involving the US and China, with European nations starting at a clear disadvantage.

Underlying Factors of the Continent's Innovation Gap

A number of major factors explain this technological divide.

• Venture Capital: The US boasts a far deeper and more dynamic system for funding startups. The EU has yet to establish a genuine capital markets union, a factor that caps the scale of new firms.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Excessive and fragmented regulation hamper European business. A US startup can launch a product under a single regulatory framework to access a market of over 330 million. The EU, despite a bigger population size, is split among 27 separate regimes, creating significant market obstacles.
• Cultural Attitudes: Views on entrepreneurial failure vary greatly. In some EU nations, business failure was historically viewed with penalties, whereas in the United States, it is often considered a badge of experience.
• Military Investment: The US benefits from a deeply integrated academic-military-industrial complex. Europe's chronic underinvestment in military capabilities has weakened its capacity for breakthrough innovation.

A Path Forward: Grounds for Hopefulness

Despite these challenges, there are causes for optimism. European leaders are increasingly aware of the existential challenge and have begun to advance serious reform. Notable reports on European competitiveness and the single market point to the necessity of sweeping changes.

With the right incentives and regulatory reforms, Europe's strengths could support far greater degrees of business-led breakthroughs.

Europe retains considerable advantages: high-quality human capital, excellent schools and universities, and premier research institutions. Coupled with a large internal market and high savings rates, these foundations have the potential to trigger a new wave of venture creation.

Importantly, even if the EU does not become the leader in creating cutting-edge technologies, it can still dramatically increase economic output by adopting and adapting advancements from elsewhere.

An Inflection Point

Europe now stands at a critical crossroads. As the saying goes, decline often happens "gradually and then suddenly". To date, the continent's technological decline has been steady. But, without decisive action to address its structural weaknesses, today's slow erosion could give way to a sudden and irreversible decline in world influence.