🔗 Share this article

As any significant prize-giving event nears, one notices an outcry to include fresh award types to acknowledge overlooked contributions and satisfy the hearts of followers who have specialized interests.

Another commentator previously argued supporting a scary games classification. That would be fantastic. The same goes for tabletop games, this being someone's personal cause. Yet I need to apologize in advance if I try to elbow in front just as with other single-minded supporters, there's a strong justification supporting my request stands as crucial and significant. Here's the proposal: We need a category for puzzle games.

The Genre Classification Challenge

Categorizing art by genre is not a science; it remains highly personal, and it will always spark debates concluding with vague boundaries. There’s a reason cinema institutions steer clear of genre categories. Yet it remains an essential concession in the world of video games, showing incredible range it's challenging to consider them one unified medium.

For comprehensive acknowledgment of achievement in video games to gain proper attention, while allowing diverse titles to receive proper recognition, specific award classifications remain vital.

Present Award Structure

The major gaming awards presently include classifications covering Action, Adventure-action titles, RPG experiences, Combat games, Simulation and strategy titles, and Sports/Racing games. Collectively, these six categories effectively encompass a lot of ground, allowing placement for numerous titles.

This doesn't apply to logic-based experiences. There’s simply nowhere for their placement. Examine these examples from this year’s best games, each quite distinct: building puzzles from a specific release, the pulse-pounding block-matching from another release, and the sweetly sociological logic puzzles from additional release. Which classification works within current classifications? Simply put, no category fits.

The Representation Problem

Numerous examples exist excellent brain-teasers published annually without proper recognition at major award shows, if they accidentally match award groups including Handheld titles, VR/AR Game, or the intensely contested independent game categories.

• A renowned logic title wasn’t nominated for anything that year
• Another imaginative release missed out in 2019
• Popular arranging title was overlooked that year
• Just some puzzle games managed to sneak into niche award types

Importance of Logic Titles

These are often compact experiences, however the design of the puzzle game is of massive significance. Well-known matching games stand as most engaged experiences worldwide and have been for many years.

The iconic tile-matching title challenges well-known building titles for the title of best-selling game of all time; it’s also in the running as greatest title ever. Brain-teasers form essential building blocks to the art of video games, and they are in conversation with diverse game types.

Proposal and Rationale

Brain-teasers wouldn't encounter that issue. One could readily select five nominees with fascinating, diverse, deserving games annually without trouble — actually, with challenge, because you’d have to leave numerous deserving experiences.

And to reiterate, these are games that otherwise have no home in important events. Brain-teaser creators function at the hard edge interactive creation, creating some of most fundamental forms within interactive entertainment. Comparable to film action specialists, they deserve recognition. Let’s not keep them waiting 35 years.